Jeffrey Gurrola is a partner at Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP and a State Bar certified appellate specialist. He briefs and argues civil appeals and writ petitions in California and federal appellate courts across a wide spectrum of business and public entity disputes and cases involving tort, contract, family, and consumer law.
Michael Alfera is a senior associate in the litigation practice of Munck Wilson Mandala in Los Angeles, where he develops winning, results oriented case strategies in complex commercial disputes. He represents both plaintiffs and defendants in high stakes business and commercial litigation in state and federal courts, and clients trust him to distill complexity into clear, persuasive arguments and narratives that move decision makers.
Live Video-Broadcast: September 24, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
The Best Argument Loses When the Writing Buries It
Courts are busier than ever, and every brief competes for attention the moment it is filed. A strong argument no longer carries weak writing. This program treats brief writing as a repeatable craft, moving through a proven four stage process that separates creative drafting from structural planning, careful construction, and critical editing.
The stakes are immediate. Bury the lead and the court skims past it. Trip a reader's pet peeve and credibility erodes before the argument begins. Waste the table of contents and you surrender the first page the court actually studies. Every structural choice either earns attention or loses it.
Attendees will walk away with a stage by stage writing process, techniques for openings and tables of contents that frame the case, methods for building memorable themes and strong conclusions, and paragraph and sentence level edits they can apply to the next brief on their desk.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: September 24, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Jeffrey Gurrola, Partner | Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP
Jeffrey Gurrola is a partner at Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP and a State Bar certified appellate specialist. He briefs and argues civil appeals and writ petitions in California and federal appellate courts across a wide spectrum of business and public entity disputes and cases involving tort, contract, family, and consumer law. Having previously practiced as a trial litigator and as an in-house litigation attorney, he brings a deep understanding of the considerations clients and their trial teams face when pursuing or defending an appeal or writ petition.
Jeff earned his JD from Yale Law School in 2012, where he served as Managing Editor and Lead Editor of the Yale Law & Policy Review and as Activism Chair of the OutLaws LGBT student group. He received his BA magna cum laude in Political Science and Interdisciplinary Studies from the University of Southern California in 2009, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, inducted into the Order of Troy, captained the USC Mock Trial Team, and served as chapter president of the Mortar Board National College Senior Honor Society. He is admitted to practice in California and before the United States Courts of Appeals for the Eighth and Ninth Circuits.
Jeff is recognized by Best Lawyers in The Best Lawyers in America for Appellate Practice for 2025 and 2026. His recent results include EchoSpan, Inc. v. Medallia, Inc., in which the Ninth Circuit reinstated a $25.7 million jury verdict the district court had reduced to zero, City of Santa Clarita v. Canyon View Limited, reversing a judgment that ordered removal of a hillside solar energy system, and Friend of Camden, Inc. v. Brandt, a published decision of first impression holding that LLC members may dissolve the company by vote even while a judicial dissolution action is pending.
Jeff serves as a Board Member of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers and as Co-Editor of the ABTL Report, and he is a member of the National LGBT Bar Association. He assists GMSR partner Laurie Hepler in her role as Contributing Editor of the Rutter Group treatise Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Appeals and Writs, the authoritative treatise on civil appellate practice in California. He regularly speaks to groups of trial lawyers on appellate developments and record preservation, with recent programs including Recent Developments in Appealability for Pincus Professional Education in 2025 and The Appeal Killers CLE webinar in 2023.
Jeff specializes in appeals while remaining a subject matter generalist, regularly briefing and arguing in both California and federal appellate courts. He also consults with trial attorneys before, during, and after trial to advise on key legal issues, assist in drafting dispositive post-trial motions, and prepare attorneys and clients to pursue or defend a subsequent appeal. His additional notable wins include Riversiders Against Increased Taxes v. City of Riverside, reversing a determination that a local tax election failed constitutional requirements, and Coastline JX Holdings LLC v. Letwak & Bennett, reinstating a default judgment and an attorney fee award of approximately $300,000.
Michael Alfera, Senior Associate | Munck Wilson Mandala
Michael Alfera is a senior associate in the litigation practice of Munck Wilson Mandala in Los Angeles, where he develops winning, results oriented case strategies in complex commercial disputes. He represents both plaintiffs and defendants in high stakes business and commercial litigation in state and federal courts, and clients trust him to distill complexity into clear, persuasive arguments and narratives that move decision makers. A recognized thought leader on legal writing and litigation strategy, he regularly presents CLE programs that equip other attorneys to elevate their advocacy.
Michael earned his JD summa cum laude from Southwestern Law School in 2018 and his BA in Music magna cum laude from the University of Southern California in 2009. He is admitted to practice in California and before the United States District Courts for the Central and Southern Districts of California. In law school he was a member of the championship team at the 2018 Wagner Labor and Employment Law National Moot Court Competition in New York City.
In April 2025 Michael took the stage at TEDxSouthwestern, where he explored the evolving impact of artificial intelligence on the legal profession. His recent presentations include Ten Tips to Transform Your Legal Writing for the Southwestern Law School Inn of Court, The Lawyer’s Guide to Impactful Writing for Justia, and prior myLawCLE webinars on legal writing and business litigation. He is also the founder of The L.A. Choral Lab, a 501(c)(3) performing arts nonprofit dedicated to advancing the modern choral art form.
Michael serves as an Executive Committee Member and Barrister of the Southwestern Law School Chapter of the American Inns of Court and as an Executive Committee Member of the Young Lawyers’ Division of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers.
Michael has first-chaired two bench trials, including a commercial unlawful detainer trial, obtaining complete victory for his clients in both cases. He co-chaired a federal jury trial in a hotly contested trademark dispute, securing a $1.4 million verdict and defeating all counterclaims, and he second-chaired a California state trial of a business partnership dispute that produced a $2.7 million jury verdict including significant punitive damages. He also conducted four depositions in a highly contested breach of fiduciary duty and defamation case and cross-examined the same witnesses at the arbitration hearing. Earlier in his career he served as a judicial law clerk in California state court and federal court, providing research and draft work product on hundreds of cases.
SESSION 1 – The Stages of Writing: Madman, Architect, Carpenter, and Judge | 1:00pm – 1:20pm
A four stage approach to the writing process that separates creative drafting, structural planning, careful construction, and critical editing, giving each phase of the brief its own focused attention.
SESSION 2 – Understanding Your Audience and Avoiding Common Judge Pet Peeves | 1:20pm – 1:40pm
How busy courts actually read briefs, the recurring pet peeves that erode credibility before the argument begins, and the practical habits that keep the reader focused on the merits.
SESSION 3 – Crafting Engaging Openings and Leveraging Your Table of Contents | 1:40pm – 2:00pm
Techniques for openings that frame the case from the first sentence, plus strategies for turning the table of contents into a persuasive roadmap of the entire brief.
BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm
SESSION 4 – Creating Memorable Themes and Impactful Conclusions | 2:10pm – 2:40pm
Building a memorable theme that unifies the brief from start to finish, and closing with conclusions that reinforce the requested relief and leave a lasting impression.
SESSION 5 – Paragraph- and Sentence-Level Hacks to Make Your Brief Shine | 2:40pm – 3:10pm
Paragraph and sentence level techniques that tighten prose, improve flow, and make the brief stand out, with concrete edits ready to apply to the next filing.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General