Redetermination Under 405[u] for “Fraud or Similar Fault” – NOSSCR 2026 Fall National Conference – Track II (Presented by National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives)

Ann J. Atkinson
Ann J. Atkinson | Ann J. Atkinson, Attorney at Law

Ann J. Atkinson, Esq., has represented claimants in Social Security disability claims since 1986, and is currently a solo practitioner in Parker, Colorado.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 16, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

No Complicity Required: Redetermination Can Reach Any Claimant

The statute's reach is the shock. Under 42 U.S.C. §405(u), enacted in 1994, claimants can be subjected to draconian "redetermination" proceedings regardless of their own complicity in any alleged "fraud or similar fault." The claimant's innocence is not a defense to the proceeding itself.

The history shows how the statute gets used. Since enactment, SSA has targeted large numbers of claimants — in Puerto Rico, in New York, and, beginning 16 years ago, in Kentucky. A representative whose region hasn't seen a wave has no assurance it won't; the statute that reached those claimants reaches everywhere.

This talk covers what a representative facing one of these proceedings needs: the rules governing redetermination under §405(u), and the current litigation testing those proceedings — where the challenges stand and what they may change.

 

Eligible for up to 1 CLE Credit Hour

This session was originally submitted for CLE as a live, in-person presentation and a live webcast for the 2026 Fall National Conference and may be eligible for self-study credit. Each state handles self-study credit differently; for questions, please consult your State Bar Association.

Recorded Friday, October 16, 2026.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The 405(u) Statute
    Redetermination under 42 U.S.C. §405(u), enacted in 1994.
  • "Fraud or Similar Fault"
    The standard that triggers redetermination — and its reach.
  • Complicity Not Required
    Why claimants face these proceedings regardless of their own complicity in any alleged fraud.
  • The Targeting History
    SSA's pursuit of large numbers of claimants in Puerto Rico, New York, and — for 16 years now — Kentucky.
  • Rules of the Proceedings
    The rules governing redetermination proceedings.
  • Current Litigation
    The litigation now challenging these proceedings.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 16, 2026

  • 10:30 am – 11:30 am Eastern
  • 9:30 am – 10:30 am Central
  • 8:30 am – 9:30 am Mountain
  • 7:30 am – 8:30 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Ann J. Atkinson, Esq., Solo Practitioner | Ann J. Atkinson, Attorney at Law

Ann J. Atkinson, Esq., has represented claimants in Social Security disability claims since 1986, and is currently a solo practitioner in Parker, Colorado.

  • Education & Credentials

She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Speech (Communication) from Northwestern University, and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Denver College of Law.

  • Recognition & Leadership

She was selected as one of Denver’s Top Lawyers by 5280 Magazine for 2015, 2016, and 2017.

  • Professional Involvement

She is a past representative from the Tenth Circuit on NOSSCR’s Board of Directors, and also served on the Board of Directors for NOSSCR PAC.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Redetermination under 405(u) for “fraud or similar fault” | 10:30am – 11:30am

Claimants can be subjected to draconian “redetermination” proceedings under 42 U.S.C. §405(u) regardless of their own complicity in any alleged “fraud or similar fault.” Since this statute was enacted in 1994, SSA has targeted large numbers of claimants in Puerto Rico, New York, and, beginning 16 years ago, Kentucky. This talk will cover the rules governing these proceedings and current litigation.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast