Minors’ Data Under the New Privacy Stack: COPPA 2.0, Teen Privacy Under the State Laws, and the Compliance Playbook for Any Business Touching Children’s Data

Max L. Landaw
Max L. Landaw
InfoLawGroup LLP

Max L. Landaw, Senior Counsel at InfoLawGroup, has over a decade of legal experience focused on counseling businesses of all kinds, with a particular focus on technology companies and businesses operating in closely regulated markets.

Joyce Kim
Joyce Kim
InfoLawGroup LLP

Joyce Kim is a skilled privacy professional with a focus on resolving complex privacy matters, covering topics such as, uses of consumer data, cookies and tracking technologies, data subject access requests, and data transfers.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 7, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

One product, one user under 18 — two enforceable regimes and a moving constitutional target

A single minor-facing feature can now trigger the amended COPPA Rule for users under 13 and the teen-consent, sensitive-data, and profiling provisions of a growing set of state privacy laws for users 13 to 17, each with its own definitions, consent mechanics, and enforcement posture. Counsel advising any business that touches children's or teens' data must reconcile obligations that were never designed to fit together.

This program concentrates on the two regimes that are enforceable today. Hour one covers the amended COPPA Rule, and how the state privacy laws treat minors' data as a distinct category. The state age-appropriate design codes will be addressed through a focused litigation status report rather than a compliance module, because their core provisions remain in active First Amendment litigation and are not a stable basis for design-stage advice. The second hour turns to execution: determining whether these regimes apply to a given product, walking through different compliance obligations and practical considerations, and assembling the documentation file that withstands an FTC or state attorney general inquiry.

Attendees leave with a practical playbook for advising minor-facing businesses under conditions of active regulatory flux — and a clear map of where the enforcement risk actually sits today.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The Amended COPPA Rule
    What changed on verifiable parental consent, retention limits, targeted advertising, and third-party data sharing — and the compliance deadlines that matter now.
  • Minors and Teens Under State Privacy Laws
    Teen consent tiers, sensitive-data classification, and profiling and targeted-advertising limits across the state patchwork.
  • Applicability, Actual Knowledge, and Age Signals
    Audience determination for child-directed and mixed-audience services, when actual knowledge attaches, and where the design-code litigation leaves age estimation.
  • The Compliance File and Enforcement Posture
    Impact assessments for minor-facing features, vendor terms, and the documentation that protects the company, along with current FTC and state attorney general enforcement priorities.
  • The Design Codes in the Courts
    A litigation status report on the state age-appropriate design codes: which provisions are currently enjoined, which remain enforceable, and what the First Amendment challenges mean for design-stage advice.
  • Advertising, Engagement Design, and Dark Patterns
    Managing targeted advertising, engagement-design features, and dark-pattern exposure for minor users — and where these practices sit in the enforcement crosshairs.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 7, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Max L. Landaw, Senior Counsel | InfoLawGroup LLP

Max L. Landaw, Senior Counsel at InfoLawGroup, has over a decade of legal experience focused on counseling businesses of all kinds, with a particular focus on technology companies and businesses operating in closely regulated markets. Max keeps abreast of technological developments that carry legal consequences and counsels clients on vendor transactions, privacy compliance, intellectual property protection, and marketing initiatives.

  • Education & Credentials

Max earned his Juris Doctor from UC Hastings College of the Law in 2011 and his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from UC Berkeley in 2008. He is admitted to practice in California (2011), Texas (2019), and Illinois (2020).

  • Recognition & Leadership

Max serves as Treasurer of the Data Privacy Section of the Austin Bar Association.

  • Professional Involvement

Max is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (“IAPP”) and holds the CIPP/E, CIPP/US, and AIGP (Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional) certifications. He is also a member of the Association of National Advertisers (ANA).

  • Experience

Max advises on privacy law, including rules around minor data protection, across more than fifteen jurisdictions spanning six continents, from the United States and Canada to the European Union, Israel, South Africa, the Gulf States, and markets across Asia Pacific. He drafts data protection agreements and addenda covering both controller-to-controller and controller-to-processor transfers, and advises on responding to data subject requests and inquiries from international supervisory authorities. He also advises on AI governance and on the legal issues raised by AI, drafting AI governance and acceptable use policies, negotiating AI-related provisions in contracts, and counseling on the intellectual property and confidentiality risks raised by AI tools. He has worked with the EU AI Act, and his AI practice frequently intersects with his biometrics work, where he advises on biometric data processing terms in vendor agreements. In helping clients implement privacy by design and default, Max supports new product launches and negotiates SaaS agreements, software licenses, developer and API agreements, and vendor and supplier agreements.

 

Joyce Kim, Counsel | InfoLawGroup LLP

Joyce Kim is a skilled privacy professional with a focus on resolving complex privacy matters, covering topics such as, uses of consumer data, cookies and tracking technologies, data subject access requests, and data transfers. A significant part of her practice involves the heightened rules that apply to children’s and student data, including COPPA compliance for child-directed and mixed-audience services and privacy counseling for ed-tech providers and the schools they serve. She has a particular mastery for drafting internal and consumer-facing policies, helping clients shape their business practices to safeguard privacy and stay compliant. Joyce is passionate about tracking evolving privacy legislation to keep clients well-informed of developments that may impact their operations.

  • Education & Credentials

Joyce earned her Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Washington University School of Law in 2020 and her Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2016. She is admitted to practice in Illinois (2021).

  • Recognition & Leadership

At Washington University School of Law, Joyce sat on the Investigative Committee of the Honor Council, chaired the Pro Bono Committee of the Public Service Advisory Board, and served as an Associate Editor of the Washington University Journal of Law and Policy.

  • Professional Involvement

Joyce is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (“IAPP”) and is both a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US) and Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP). She is also a member of the National Asian American Pacific Bar Association (NAPABA) and the Association of National Advertisers (ANA).

  • Experience

Joyce also brings a wealth of experience and versatile set of skills as a result of her litigation and M&A experience. As a corporate finance associate, Joyce advised on M&A transactions by conducting due diligence and preparing critical agreements. Her strong advocacy skills also stem from representing clients in legal disputes concerning real estate, antitrust, employment, products liability, commercial contracts, and intellectual property rights.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The New Regulatory Stack: COPPA’s Amendments and the State Kids’ Codes | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session maps the regulatory terrain. Attorneys will learn what the FTC’s amended COPPA Rule changed; how state privacy laws layer teen-consent tiers, sensitive-data treatment, and profiling and targeted advertising limits onto the federal baseline for the 13 to 17 band COPPA does not reach; and a status report on the state age-appropriate design codes, including which provisions are currently enjoined, which are enforceable.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Building the Minors’ Data Compliance Program That Survives an Investigation | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session turns the map into a playbook: determining whether a service is “directed to children” and when actual knowledge attaches, including the mixed-audience problem; implementing age assurance without over-collecting the very data the regimes protect; managing advertising, engagement-design, and dark-pattern exposure for minor users; and assembling the documentation file that holds up under FTC and state AG scrutiny. The session closes with Q&A and practical takeaways.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars