Civil RICO for the Business Litigator: Pleading the Claim and Trebling the Damages

Joshua M. Robbins
Joshua M. Robbins
Crowell & Moring

Joshua M. Robbins is a partner at Crowell & Moring, where he handles high-stakes fraud litigation and investigations, with particular depth in health care and life sciences, white collar defense, and antitrust matters. A former federal prosecutor, he has tried and litigated RICO claims on both the plaintiff and the defense side.

Callan G. Stein
Callan G. Stein
Troutman Pepper Locke

Callan G. Stein is a partner in the Boston office of Troutman Pepper Locke, where his practice spans complex civil litigation and white-collar criminal defense, with a concentration in civil and criminal RICO, health care fraud and abuse, government enforcement defense, internal investigations, and collegiate athletics and name, image, and likeness (NIL) matters.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 21, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Treble damages are mandatory — but only for the complaint that survives dismissal

The civil RICO landscape shifted twice in twelve months. The Supreme Court's April 2025 ruling in Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn redefined which economic losses flowing from personal injury are recoverable. The February 2026 Farmers v. 1st Choice decision and recent Fifth and Eighth Circuit dismissals have tightened pleading scrutiny at the same time.

The stakes are set at the pleading stage. Cast a garden-variety fraud scheme as a RICO enterprise, and the court dismisses. Offer boilerplate mail and wire fraud predicates, and Rule 9(b) cuts them. Miss continuity under H.J., Inc., and the pattern fails. Courts now deny leave to amend when flagged deficiencies go ignored.

This two-session program delivers the work product: an element-by-element pleading framework under § 1962(c), a pre-suit investigation checklist, and a damages case built to prove proximate cause, treble the award, and recover lodestar fees under § 1964(c) — plus realistic recovery ranges for advising clients. That is practitioner judgment no form complaint supplies.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Element-by-Element Pleading
    How to plead each of the four required elements under § 1962(c) and select the right subsection — before the complaint is drafted.
  • Proving the Enterprise
    What separates a true RICO enterprise from a garden-variety fraud scheme: distinctness, association-in-fact structure, and the operation-or-management test.
  • Pattern and Particularity
    How to plead mail and wire fraud predicate acts to Rule 9(b)'s particularity standard and satisfy the continuity analysis under H.J., Inc.
  • Pre-Suit Investigation Checklist
    Which common pleading failures drive the recent Fifth and Eighth Circuit dismissals and the February 2026 Farmers v. 1st Choice decision — and the pre-suit steps that avoid them.
  • Proximate Cause Proof
    How the direct-relationship requirement and the Supreme Court's April 2025 Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn ruling determine which losses are compensable.
  • Treble Damages and Fees
    How to prove the actual damages that get trebled and recover attorney's fees under § 1964(c), using the lodestar method as strategic leverage.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 21, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Joshua M. Robbins, Partner | Crowell & Moring

Joshua M. Robbins is a partner at Crowell & Moring, where he handles high-stakes fraud litigation and investigations, with particular depth in health care and life sciences, white collar defense, and antitrust matters. A former federal prosecutor, he has tried and litigated RICO claims on both the plaintiff and the defense side.

  • Education & Credentials

Josh earned his A.B., magna cum laude, from Harvard College, where he received the John Harvard Scholarship, his J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School, and an M.A.L.D. from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He served as a law clerk to the Honorable Stanley Marcus of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. He is admitted to practice in California, the District of Columbia, and New York, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and in the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Northern, and Southern Districts of California and the District of Columbia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Josh is ranked by Chambers USA (2025) and has been named a Los Angeles Business Journal Leader of Influence (2025), a Benchmark Litigation Star (2022–2026), and to Best Lawyers in America (2022–2026). The Daily Journal recognized his team’s result as a Top Defense Verdict (2024) and named him among its Top White-Collar Lawyers (2021–2023). As a federal prosecutor, he received the Department of Justice Director’s Award for Superior Performance (2015).

  • Professional Involvement

Josh teaches trial advocacy at the U.C. Irvine School of Law, serves as a Ninth Circuit Lawyer Representative, and is president of the Harvard Law School Association of Orange County. He has also served as an expert witness on health care anti-kickback law.

  • Experience

Josh served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California from 2009 to 2016. His RICO work includes a defense verdict for a water manufacturer in a $200 million federal antitrust and RICO lawsuit, plaintiff-side representations against a global religious organization for human trafficking and against a city government and its officials for public corruption, and the defense of an artificial intelligence company in a RICO and computer fraud lawsuit.

 

Callan G. Stein_FedBarCallan G. Stein, Partner | Troutman Pepper Locke

Callan G. Stein is a partner in the Boston office of Troutman Pepper Locke, where his practice spans complex civil litigation and white-collar criminal defense, with a concentration in civil and criminal RICO, health care fraud and abuse, government enforcement defense, internal investigations, and collegiate athletics and name, image, and likeness (NIL) matters. He hosts the firm’s RICO Report podcast and has written more than sixty articles on RICO, the False Claims Act, and related enforcement topics.

  • Education & Credentials

Cal earned his J.D. from Boston University School of Law and his B.A., cum laude, from Brandeis University. He is admitted to practice in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, in the U.S. District Courts for the District of Massachusetts and the District of Rhode Island, and before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Cal has been named to Best Lawyers in America for Health Care Law (2021–2026), Criminal Defense: White-Collar (2023–2026), and Litigation – Health Care (2026) and recognized in the JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards for White-Collar Defense (2023, 2025), Boston Magazine’s Top Lawyers list for Criminal Defense: White Collar (2021–2023), and Legal 500 United States for white collar criminal defense (2019). Earlier recognition includes Massachusetts Rising Stars (2014–2019) and Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly’s Up & Coming Attorney honor (2013).

  • Professional Involvement

Cal is a faculty member of the National Institute for Trial Advocacy and teaches trial advocacy to his firm’s associates. He hosts the RICO Report podcast, co-hosts the Highway to NIL podcast, and edits the NIL Revolution blog. He is a member of the Boston Bar Association, the Massachusetts Bar Association, and the American Health Lawyers Association.

  • Experience

Cal’s civil RICO results include a defense verdict for a satellite company following an international arbitration on claims alleging more than $100 million in damages, dismissals of civil RICO claims for a family business facing nearly $20 million in alleged damages, a thyroid medicine manufacturer, Fox News defendants, a bank and credit reporting agency, and a medical device company, and the successful prosecution of civil RICO claims against former Chinese distributors for wire fraud and trade secret misappropriation. In criminal RICO-adjacent work, he represented Barry Cadden in the New England Compounding Center case, securing not guilty verdicts on all 25 second-degree murder charges after a three-month trial, and he obtained the first reported summary judgment for a defendant in a Paycheck Protection Program fraud qui tam action under the False Claims Act.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Pleading a Civil RICO Claim That Survives Dismissal | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session equips business litigators with a granular, element-by-element framework for drafting civil RICO complaints that survive Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal. Attorneys will examine the four required elements under § 1962(c), the Rule 9(b) particularity standard as applied to mail and wire fraud predicates, the enterprise-distinctness and operation-or-management requirements, and the pattern-of-racketeering continuity analysis under H.J., Inc. Drawing on recent Fifth and Eighth Circuit dismissals and the February 2026 Farmers v. 1st Choice decision, attendees will leave with a practical checklist for pre-suit investigation, subsection selection, and complaint architecture.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Proving Causation and Recovering Treble Damages and Fees in Civil RICO | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session covers the causation and damages phase of civil RICO litigation, from satisfying the direct-relationship proximate cause requirement through calculating and recovering mandatory treble damages and attorney’s fees under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c). Attorneys will learn the governing trilogy of Supreme Court decisions on RICO proximate cause, the mechanics of treble-damages proof, and the lodestar framework for fee recovery — all updated for the Supreme Court’s April 2025 ruling in Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn. Attendees leave with a practical framework for building a damages case that survives defense challenges and for advising clients on realistic recovery ranges.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, August 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast